A Contradictory Concurrence: Why Do "Slow Cure" and "Excessive Cracking" Occur Simultaneously?
Traditionally, "slow cure" typically indicates insufficient crosslink density, while "cracking" indicates excessive crosslink density and excessive internal stress. These two seem to be at opposite ends of the spectrum, so how can they coexist in the same formulation? This is the crux of the matter. It reveals an overlooked truth: what we pursue isn't a simple "average functionality" value, but rather a "properly distributed crosslinked network structure."
When a formulation is mismatched, the following disastrous polymerization processes are most common:
High functionality does not equal high crosslink density. Formulators often mistakenly use high-functionality monomers to build crosslink density. The correct combination is a "homogeneous network" constructed from a balanced mix of high-, medium-, and low-functionality raw materials. Within this network, flexible segments (derived from PUAs or difunctional groups) are interspersed between rigid nodes (derived from high-functionality groups), creating a "rigid and flexible" structure.
UV curing formula design is a precise "material architecture". Cracking rates exceeding 20% or slow curing are just manifestations of a building's "collapse". As formulators, our responsibility is not to "patch" the cracks (such as adding additives), but to return to the design blueprint and examine the load-bearing structure of this "building" - that is, the ratio of functionality and the distribution of cross-linking density. A successful UV formula must have a "homogeneous" and "strong" cross-linking network. It is not achieved by the "violent stacking" of one or two high-functionality raw materials, but by the perfect synergy of high, medium and low-functionality components in reaction kinetics.
Contact Person: Mr. Eric Hu
Tel: 0086-13510152819